nayabaru:naya
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| nayabaru:naya [2023-12-19 15:11] – pinkgothic | nayabaru:naya [2025-01-03 15:56] (current) – Another possessive form pinkgothic | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
| * using goal-plurals instead of profession-plurals, | * using goal-plurals instead of profession-plurals, | ||
| * usage of singular modifiers when something reflects (or should reflect) a group choice is various degrees of offensive. (e.g. "negt heshetur", | * usage of singular modifiers when something reflects (or should reflect) a group choice is various degrees of offensive. (e.g. "negt heshetur", | ||
| + | |||
| + | Possessive forms are denoted, in ascending order of formality, either by simple affixing the pronoun to its subject (e.g. ' | ||
| ===== Inflections ===== | ===== Inflections ===== | ||
| Line 111: | Line 113: | ||
| * **tna͡uchety͡in** - it may strike / another may strike | * **tna͡uchety͡in** - it may strike / another may strike | ||
| * **tna͡uchety͡ir** - you (singular) may strike | * **tna͡uchety͡ir** - you (singular) may strike | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Requested future tense** (used when requesting a future action from someone, the English "would you x?" becomes "you x?"): | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **tna͡uchetto** - would we please strike | ||
| + | * **tna͡uchetno** - would they please strike | ||
| + | * **tna͡uchetro** - would you (plural) please strike | ||
| + | * **tna͡ucheton** - would it please strike / would another please strike | ||
| + | * **tna͡uchetor** - would you (singular) please strike | ||
| **Past tense** (archaic - effectively absent in modern Naya, where past tense is replaced with observations on present consequences): | **Past tense** (archaic - effectively absent in modern Naya, where past tense is replaced with observations on present consequences): | ||
nayabaru/naya.1702998663.txt.gz · Last modified: by pinkgothic
