kavkem:colour-vision
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
kavkem:colour-vision [2018-05-11 00:43] – pinkgothic | kavkem:colour-vision [2018-05-16 21:03] (current) – pinkgothic | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| | x | x | | yes | osodi | green | turquoise | | | | x | x | | yes | osodi | green | turquoise | | ||
| | | | ||
- | | x | | + | | x | |
| x | | x | x | no | ::: | ::: | ::: | | | x | | x | x | no | ::: | ::: | ::: | | ||
| x | x | | x | no | ::: | ::: | ::: | | | x | x | | x | no | ::: | ::: | ::: | | ||
- | | | x | | x | no | sos̈et | + | | | x | | x | no | **sos̈et** | green-violet | green-ultraviolet; |
- | | x | | x | | no | validi | red-turquoise | magenta | | + | | x | | x | | no | **validi** | red-turquoise | magenta | |
We derive that there are three imaginary lines of colour, of which we can unfortunately only imagine one: | We derive that there are three imaginary lines of colour, of which we can unfortunately only imagine one: | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| x | x | | x | no | ::: | ::: | ::: | | | x | x | | x | no | ::: | ::: | ::: | | ||
- | This is because the last two variants of // | + | This is because the last two variants of // |
===== Hue Modifiers ===== | ===== Hue Modifiers ===== | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
Not all colours are spectral, as we already know. What about **vals̈et**? | Not all colours are spectral, as we already know. What about **vals̈et**? | ||
- | * **zys̈' | + | * **zys̈' |
* **vas̈' | * **vas̈' | ||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
Instead, their word for saturation derives from **heavy** (//muri//) the more //heavy// a colour, the more it displaces the other spectral colours. | Instead, their word for saturation derives from **heavy** (//muri//) the more //heavy// a colour, the more it displaces the other spectral colours. | ||
- | The modifier word itself - //amur// - is a linguistic opposite of this concept, and we will translate it as //pale// (even if ' | + | The modifier word itself - //amur// - is a linguistic opposite of this concept, and we will translate it as //diluted// (or // |
^ Kendane͡ivash ^ English ^ | ^ Kendane͡ivash ^ English ^ | ||
- | | // | + | | // |
- | | // | + | | // |
- | | // | + | | // |
- | | // | + | | // |
- | | // | + | | // |
The term // | The term // | ||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
**amur valek** is roughly where the 3 in our example is - a definite red, but still rather subdued. | **amur valek** is roughly where the 3 in our example is - a definite red, but still rather subdued. | ||
- | **amur' | + | **amur' |
**(amur' | **(amur' | ||
- | This affects compound colours much the same way - the less they are washed out by unrelated colour components, the more '// | + | (**// |
+ | |||
+ | This affects compound colours much the same way - the less they are washed out by unrelated colour components, the more '// | ||
Saturation modifiers also have some implications for // | Saturation modifiers also have some implications for // | ||
^ //valek// ^ //oso// ^ //idi// ^ //s̈elet// ^ spectral ^ Kendane͡ivash ^ English (kavkem) ^ | ^ //valek// ^ //oso// ^ //idi// ^ //s̈elet// ^ spectral ^ Kendane͡ivash ^ English (kavkem) ^ | ||
- | | x | | + | | x | |
- | | x | | x | x | no | amur' | + | | x | | x | x | no | amur' |
- | | x | x | | x | no | amur' | + | | x | x | | x | no | amur' |
===== Lightness Modifiers ===== | ===== Lightness Modifiers ===== | ||
Line 167: | Line 169: | ||
^ //valek// ^ //oso// ^ //idi// ^ //s̈elet// ^ spectral ^ Kendane͡ivash ^ English (kavkem) ^ | ^ //valek// ^ //oso// ^ //idi// ^ //s̈elet// ^ spectral ^ Kendane͡ivash ^ English (kavkem) ^ | ||
- | | x | | + | | x | |
- | | x | | x | x | no | amur' | + | | x | | x | x | no | amur' |
- | | x | x | | x | no | amur' | + | | x | x | | x | no | amur' |
===== Combining the modifiers ===== | ===== Combining the modifiers ===== | ||
- | ... | + | Generally speaking, any order of combinations is understood and describe the same colours, except where local dialect has defined otherwise. The ' |
+ | |||
+ | **[amur...] [ath'/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The default modifiers that are assumed if none of a particular type are supplied are: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Modifier ^ Default ^ Meaning ^ | ||
+ | | //amur// | // | ||
+ | | //ath' / vem'// | neither | regular - neither light, nor dark | | ||
+ | | // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Examples: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Example ^ Translation ^ Meaning ^ | ||
+ | | //valek// | red | fully saturated (implied) red | | ||
+ | | // | ||
+ | | // | ||
+ | | // | ||
+ | | // | ||
+ | | // | ||
+ | | // | ||
+ | | //amur ath' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Scientific colours ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Spectral colour //ranges// also have **scientific names**. With the exception of //valek//, each primary colour of the kavkem qualia (//valek//, //oso//, //idi// and // | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ scientific term ^ wavelength ^ associated quale ^ | ||
+ | | banthu | ~500 to ~700 nm | valek | | ||
+ | | tasath | ~400 to ~600 nm | oso | | ||
+ | | venthu | ~300 to ~500 nm | idi | | ||
+ | | edath | ~200 to ~400 nm | s̈elet | | ||
+ | |||
+ | The ~100 nm overlap implies that the colours must be shared between terms. And indeed, formally, //oso// is still in the //banthu// band, although near the edge, whereas it is closer to the center of the //tasath// band. Similarly, //idi// is still n the //tasath// band, but much more central in the //venthu// band. //s̈elet// manages to almost escape // | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The scientific terms are typically used when talking about the colour cones themselves, as theoretical absorption bands - they are not precisely defined by wavelength, but by the ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | These terms are in use by (sufficiently literate) kavkema and local Threadwielders, |
kavkem/colour-vision.1525999423.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018-05-11 00:43 by pinkgothic