kavkem:mythology:ne͡imakanaas̈
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
kavkem:mythology:ne͡imakanaas̈ [2017-11-18 21:34] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | kavkem:mythology:ne͡imakanaas̈ [2020-01-07 18:46] – pinkgothic | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | **// | + | **// |
It can be encountered in [[planet: | It can be encountered in [[planet: | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Much as in //[[Nitish Ynas]]//, deities in // | Much as in //[[Nitish Ynas]]//, deities in // | ||
- | One notable exception comes in the form of [[: | + | ==== Ateheril ==== |
- | Verbal communication alone is not assumed to be sufficient to share the knowledge. Mystical components vary from the mundane variant requiring a sort of bodily union (be it sexual or non-sexual) to the purely metaphysical, | + | //Main article: [[: |
+ | |||
+ | The deity **Ateheril** decides the appearance of the Mirage, although he himself is invisible and unapproachable, | ||
+ | |||
+ | That said, some adherents of // | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Tamas̈elu ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | //Main article: [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Although the traditional // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Verbal communication alone is not assumed to be sufficient to share the knowledge. Mystical components vary from the mundane variant requiring a sort of bodily union (be it sexual or non-sexual) to the purely metaphysical, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Other ==== | ||
Other deities are considered entirely metaphorical in // | Other deities are considered entirely metaphorical in // | ||
Line 23: | Line 37: | ||
===== Rituals and spirituality ===== | ===== Rituals and spirituality ===== | ||
- | One might assume the [[kavkem: | + | One might assume the [[kavkem: |
===== Competing faiths ===== | ===== Competing faiths ===== |
kavkem/mythology/ne͡imakanaas̈.txt · Last modified: 2024-03-31 20:04 by pinkgothic